We are organising a hackathon on Friday, 30th January, at HSBXL in Brussels, Belgium! Learn more and don't forget to register!

Amandine Le Pape

14 posts tagged with "Amandine Le Pape" (See all authors)

The 2025 Matrix Holiday Special

2025-12-24 — General, Holiday SpecialMatthew Hodgson, Amandine Le Pape

Hi all,

2025 has been another bumper year for Matrix, and I’m happy to say that we’re ending it on a distinctly positive note.

Frankly, it feels like the gamble to secure the future of Matrix may be paying off. We’re seeing more and more uptake of Matrix in the wild, especially in massive public sector deployments like ZenDiS’s openDesk in Germany and the European Commission; we’re now tracking over 25(!) countries who are actively deploying Matrix in order to maintain true digital sovereignty over their communication - and we’re at the point where dedicated Matrix vendors like Element are starting to get sustainable, allowing them in turn to contribute more to the Foundation and the development of the protocol and ecosystem.

On the other hand, the Foundation itself is still not independently sustainable yet: while memberships have doubled over the last year, work on independently safeguarding the core of the protocol (especially Trust & Safety, Security, Spec and Advocacy work) is painfully underfunded. If your organisation (particularly public sector orgs, vendors and integrators) depends on Matrix, please join the Foundation as a paying member to ensure it can thrive. All it takes is a few more gold members and the Foundation will be able to actually accelerate rather than operating on a shoestring, and Matrix will improve for everyone as a result. Huge thanks in particular go to DINUM and Rocket.Chat the largest Silver members who have joined the Foundation this year, Automattic/Beeper and Gematik for renewing their, respectively, Gold and large Silver memberships - and thanks indeed to all our 20 funding organisational members. Meanwhile, we’ve also started experimenting with providing paid accounts on the matrix.itmanbu.com homeserver to try to cover the costs of running the homeserver.

Overall, 2025 has been a year of maturity. Putting together the keynote for the 2025 Matrix Conference in Strasbourg was a real eyeopener - realising that on the clientside alone, Matrix now has mature independent implementations across pretty much every platform. On the serverside, things have moved on too - Synapse is more and more mature; Element launched ESS Community as a long-awaited official AGPL’d distribution of Synapse (complete with Element Admin as an official admin web interface - check out the speed run!), and Synapse Pro continues to add scalability and paid support for large deployments (alongside ESS Pro, following the philosophy that features which empower end-users end up in FOSS but features which empower enterprises end up in Pro). At the same time, the Conduit family of native-rust homeservers has continued to expand and accelerate - from Conduit to Continuwuity to Grapevine and Tuwunel.

2025 is also the year that the Governing Board really started to flourish as one of the main vehicles of open governance in Matrix, with 4 working groups stepping up to take on critical tasks such as running The Matrix Conference, maintaining the matrix.itmanbu.com website itself, and coordinating Trust & Safety work across the ecosystem, and more to come like the Matrix for Public Sector Working Group (to be published soon) and new ideas brewing like the Fundraising Working Group to support the fundraising effort of the Foundation. Don’t hesitate to pop up in the Office of the Foundation room to express interest for a given WG or propose new ones! We bade farewell to Robin as the inaugural Managing Director of the Foundation back in November, but their work operationalising the Foundation’s open governance is a fantastic legacy and unlocks a huge amount of momentum for Matrix.

Talking of which, The Matrix Conference itself was a great success this year, with incredible talks from across the whole ecosystem - especially highlighting all the Public Sector uptake Matrix is seeing in support of nations pursuing digital sovereignty. The event itself was a real triumph of opening up the governance of Matrix via the Governing Board, with the Events Working Group organising the whole event and even turning a profit - not least due to the huge amounts of volunteering that the community stepped up to provide. If you missed the talks, go check them out on YouTube or media.ccc.de.

Then on Matrix itself, we have had some major wins: the great migration to next generation auth via OpenID Connect happened successfully (and indeed ended up shipping in Matrix 1.15, ahead of 2.0); we landed the first and most important phase of Project Hydra in Room Version 12 to improve state resolution and reduce state resets (see Kegan’s conference talk for more); MatrixRTC has seen major improvements in the form of Sticky Events for simpler reliable signalling and Slots for improved permissions, which put it tantalisingly close to formally landing in the spec; and loads of MSCs from the wider community - including extensible profiles landing from Tom Foster in Matrix 1.16 via MSC4133. We’re still polishing the remaining MSCs slated for Matrix 2.0, but as soon as they’re ready we’ll finally pull the lever and bump the version number. Finally, there has been major steps forward in improving the footprint of metadata that Matrix stores on servers - with an encrypted state event implementation landing in labs on Element Web via MSC4362, and all the new MatrixRTC work being built to minimise serverside metadata.

It’s not been a perfect year though; Trust & Safety has been a big focus - although with the public release of policyserv a few days ago, the ongoing collaboration with ROOST, the improvements earlier in the year, and lots more work on cross-ecosystem collaboration with Draupnir and the Community Moderation Effort, we’ve certainly made some progress. There is still much to be done though. The painful truth of Trust & Safety is that it is the one thing which will determine the success or failure of Matrix in the long term. One of the most dizzying realisations we ever had was back in 2016, when Matrix first started to get momentum and we realised that the actual long-term problem we had to solve was not decentralised communication, but instead empowering users and communities to protect themselves from abuse, spam, disinformation and propaganda… and effectively find a way to map real-life societal antiabuse mechanisms onto online communities.

We naively assumed that this would rapidly get solved given the attention it started to receive, but here we are 10 years later and if anything the Web has become more and more weaponized for information warfare since, especially in a world where LLMs can spew abuse at superhuman rates. The good news is that folks like ROOST have recently appeared to work on this precise problem, and the Bluesky team are taking it seriously too with their composable moderation and user-selectable algorithmic feeds. But the race is on to get to the point in Matrix where a full set of privacy-preserving decentralised reputation tools that users and communities can use to defend themselves are available in the protocol - letting users say “by default, please filter out invites and content from randoms (be they human or bot) who nobody vouches for in my community”.

We’ve also had our fair share of operational fun & games with the matrix.itmanbu.com homeserver, and seen a lot of frustration at the speed of the transition to Matrix 2.0 - be that because the MSCs are still being finalised, or because some Element users are still stuck on the Classic app, unaware that Element X exists.

However, the reality is that the lived experience of Matrix today (at least for us!) is genuinely unrecognisably improved from even a few years ago. Unable to decrypt messages are massively reduced (assuming users don’t lose their recovery key or delete all their devices). When using Element X, you get an app not just for tech-savvy people but for everyone, with super-glossy liquid glass UI on iOS26 and a newly super-performant app on Android; built on the super-stable Rust SDK with a beautiful event cache for offline support and message echoing/queuing; complete now with threads and spaces (in labs), which is overall a genuine joy to use. Other clients building on rust-sdk like Fractal and iamb (and in the near future, Element Web) directly benefit from the same underlying engine - and meanwhile clients on other stacks like FluffyChat or Trixnity have been busy trailblazing too. There may have been a lot of criticism over the last year, but we can’t help but feel that there have also been some huge steps forwards (perhaps making the remaining gaps all the more obvious). If you’re using Matrix today and enjoying it, please don’t take it for granted! Write a blog post, tell TWIM, tell the world, tell us what we can improve, and don’t let the bad experiences drown out the positive ones.

Talking of remaining gaps: alas, they do exist. Obvious ones include Synapse resource usage: while the Element team spiked out a demonstration of how Synapse could reduce its database usage by 100x or so, they’ve been too busy with stuff like Hydra and other robustness work to go and make this a reality yet. Another sore point is that Sliding Sync performance has in matrix-rust-sdk and Synapse regressed relative to the first implementations a few years ago, thanks to simplifications on the clientside to improve maintainability as well as changes on the server. The sync performance is good, but it’s not the ~100ms “instant sync” that we had back in the first beta at FOSDEM 2023, and it would be amazing to get back to that point. Relatedly, the only other missing piece of the Sliding Sync puzzle in matrix-rust-sdk is ensuring that push notifications update the client’s event cache and application badge, so you don’t have to wait for the client to sync to read messages you were just pushed about. This work should now be unblocked by the latest event matrix-rust-sdk event cache improvements.

On the encryption side, we still have our work cut out for us. While unable-to-decrypt messages have significantly improved (at least on synapse + matrix-rust-sdk and matrix-js-sdk clients), we still see a lot of users complaining that they can’t decrypt history due to losing their recovery key. There’s a lot of work that could be done here: we’ve been experimenting with storing the recovery key in a WebAuthn Passkey and/or hardware token, or simply deriving it clientside in the OIDC identity provider (if you trust the JavaScript the IdP serves you). We also need to finish shipping the ability to share history when inviting users to a room via MSC4268, and excluding untrusted devices by default via MSC4153 (planned for April 2026). Other big stuff that needs to be addressed includes finally imposing client-controlled group membership; progressing MLS as an alternative to Olm/Megolm; progressing Post Quantum encryption (with or without MLS), and actually getting some kind of transitive trust in place rather than requiring all users having to explicitly verify each other out of band (heck, even PGP has transitive trust!).

Then, on the core protocol side, we have phase 2 and phase 3 of Hydra to progress: improving robustness further, and then introducing finality to avoid problems caused by backdating events. This should also (at last!) switch user IDs to be public keys as per MSC4243, removing the final wrinkle from Matrix’s GDPR by eliminating directly identifiable personal information from matrix IDs, as well as paving the way towards long-awaited account portability. Somewhat related to this, Element is still hopeful to do some very pragmatic P2P Matrix work in 2026, after an initial spike back in November - watch this space for details.

Finally on the clientside, we’re finally at the point where some of the auxiliary APIs are becoming the bottleneck. Having a standard way to query cross-server user directories or shared address books would be amazing, especially now we have extensible profiles in MSC4133. Likewise privacy-preserving contact lookup could be transformative for mainstream Matrix uptake. There’s also a whole ocean of work to be done to improve how we integrate external apps into Matrix - be that via Widgets, or looking at recent developments in WebXDC and other initiatives.

Who knows which of these will actually happen in 2026! A lot of it depends on whether more organisations step up and put money behind by the bar by joining the Foundation or help fund development. Needless to say, we will keep plugging away trying to fill the gaps whatever - but the question is one of speed: the more funding available, the faster it will happen. For instance, I’m painfully aware that we’ve been aiming for decentralised accounts since, uh, 2015… but this just goes to show: if the Foundation is operating on a shoestring, then the juicier stuff gets starved out, to everyone’s detriment.

Anyway, things overall feel more positive than they have for years. We’d like to massively thank the Foundation’s members, both individual and organisational, for helping get the Foundation spread its wings as far as it has - hopefully 2026 will be the year where we can truly fly! Thanks also to the Governing Board and everyone contributing to the Working Groups for increasingly effectively sharing the load of pushing Matrix forwards: it’s great to see the fruits of open governance working out. And finally: thanks to all the developers and users who continue to use and support Matrix. The world needs secure, decentralised communication more than ever right now, and thank you for keeping the faith to make it happen via Matrix.

Happy holidays!

- Matthew & Amandine, on behalf of everyone working on Matrix.

Retiring the Slack Bridge on matrix.itmanbu.com

2025-11-28 — BridgesAmandine Le Pape

Bridges are one of the reasons Matrix is called Matrix: let’s matrix all the networks together! They are key to onboard new users into the network. However, maintaining and operating bridges, in particular to closed, proprietary platforms, is expensive: they need to be kept up to date with any change made by the platform on a regular basis and they’re fiddly to keep up and running.

Continue reading…

Matrix for Public Sector: DINUM joins the Foundation as we launch a new forum!

2025-10-21 — Conference, EU, FoundationAmandine Le Pape

🔗DINUM becoming the first government to join the matrix.itmanbu.com Foundation

Today DINUM, the French Interministerial Digital Directorate, has officially announced that they were joining the matrix.itmanbu.com Foundation as a Silver member and becomes the first government to join the matrix.itmanbu.com Foundation!

This is particularly exciting news as it will hopefully set an example for other public sector organisations using Matrix to communicate, and there are many of them.

Continue reading…

matrix.itmanbu.com (Official Account) and Terms updates

2025-07-31 — matrix.itmanbu.com homeserverAmandine Le Pape

Users of the matrix.itmanbu.com homeserver have recently received – or will shortly receive as the notifications are rolled out progressively – an invite from a user called matrix.itmanbu.com (Official Account). Those checking the room will have noticed that it announces upcoming changes to our the matrix.itmanbu.com Homeserver Terms and Conditions.

Some of you have asked us questions about these two events so we would like to offer some clarification and (hopefully) some reassurance.

Continue reading…

Introducing premium accounts to fund the matrix.itmanbu.com homeserver

2025-06-13 — Foundation, General, matrix.itmanbu.com homeserverAmandine Le Pape

🔗TL;DR

As we need to take more concrete steps to improve the financial situation of the Foundation, we will be rolling out a freemium offer for the matrix.itmanbu.com homeserver users. The alternative is to turn off the server, which we want to avoid doing. The goal is for the most active users to support the cost of the service. Free users will have limits on how they can use the service (mostly around media). The change can be supported by any client with limited to no development. Premium plans will be rolled out over the summer, and we will be iterating on the exact scope in the first few weeks. The Homeserver Terms and Privacy Policy will be updated accordingly and deployed in the coming weeks.

Continue reading…

Welcoming Josh Simmons as Managing Director of the matrix.itmanbu.com Foundation!

2023-09-05 — FoundationMatthew Hodgson, Amandine Le Pape

Hi all,

Today is a big day! As you know, over the last few months we’ve been searching for a Managing Director to join the matrix.itmanbu.com Foundation full-time, focused on managing the Foundation’s finances, organising the Foundation’s membership programme, helping raise funding to support Foundation work, working with the Guardians to ensure the Foundation stays on mission, and ensuring the Foundation can operate successfully as a fully independent entity.

Continue reading…

Announcing the matrix.itmanbu.com Foundation Membership program!

2023-06-20 — FoundationAmandine Le Pape

We shared back in December how we wanted to find a way for people and organisations to support Matrix in a more impactful manner. We wanted it to also enable the Foundation to be more autonomous and more powerful in growing the ecosystem. Well the day has come: the Foundation is now able to formally accept members!

So what is a member of the matrix.itmanbu.com Foundation? It's an organisation or individual who financially supports the Foundation by paying a yearly membership fee, and in return gets some influence in driving the direction of Matrix and the Foundation's activities.

The key has been to create a balanced governance model, to make sure the Foundation stays aligned with the Matrix manifesto. For this we've created a Governing Board to set the direction of the Foundation whilst the membership fees will fuel our efforts to get us there.

So why become a member?

🔗A common, durable platform

Matrix is an open protocol everyone can contribute to. However we believe that to remain healthy, a protocol is better off having a single spec that needs to be curated. The additions need to be debated, implemented in actual software, and the rest of the specification needs to be adapted to the new changes. Such curation and edition work take time and effort, but the benefits of it are enormous.

A curated protocol benefits individuals, digital rights activists, and philanthropic investors who believe in the fundamental right to control and privacy in online communication. As an open standard for real time communications, Matrix brings the sovereignty, security and interoperability, which are key to having full control over one's own communication. By financially supporting the project, people who are aligned with our beliefs allow us to keep fighting for our collective rights, be it by providing secure software or persuading regulators to protect their citizens (such as our DMA promotion work or our fight against the Online Safety Bill).

A curated protocol benefits profit-making companies building communication products and services. Decentralisation is a hard problem. End-to-end encryption is a hard problem. Decentralised end-to-end encrypted communications are a very hard problem. Matrix is doing the heavy lifting in these areas so companies can focus on building what they do best: creating great user experiences on top of it. By financially supporting the project, organisations building on Matrix rest assured it keeps evolving, being patched and staying secure. In short it ensures Matrix remains a competitive advantage over other products, at a fraction of what it would cost to maintain an in-house solution.

A curated protocol benefits entire governments, and large parts of the public sector, who have both adopted it widely. Public organisations can not only benefit from a sovereign, secure and interoperable solution - they can also ensure public money is spent for public good, not shareholder wealth. By joining the Matrix Foundation, public sector entities contribute to the stability, security and performance of Matrix. Investing into the project ensures that the open standard that is supporting their healthcare, defence and public administration continues to benefit from innovative open source software development.

🔗Stay unbiased & vendor neutral

The Matrix manifesto hasn't changed. We still believe people should have full control over their own communication, not be locked in silos, be able to converse securely and privately, and that communication should be available to everyone as a free and open, unencumbered, standard and global network.

The Foundation maintains the Spec, which formalises the behaviour expected from the various software components of the Matrix ecosystem. We believe it's important for both individuals using the protocol - and organisations building products on top of it - to be part of the decision process when it comes to shaping the evolution and features of Matrix. So we have designed membership tiers catering for all budgets, and mapped the Governing Board representatives evenly across the tiers.

The Spec Core Team appointed by the Foundation's Guardians is particularly vigilant against features which only benefit particular players, or are designed to somehow cripple or fragment the open protocol and ecosystem in favour of competitive advantage. As such it is a guardian of the neutrality of the protocol, making sure it will serve the general public's interests and be a solid base to build robust products on for commercial organisations.

🔗Delivering from the get go

The matrix.itmanbu.com Foundation wants to take a more active stance in supporting the protocol. The Foundation needs to respond appropriately to the Governing Board's recommendations. We are hiring a Managing Director who will be in charge of identifying and building programmes the Foundation can deliver, obtaining funding for it, building a team and overseeing the delivery with the approval and support of the Governing Board.

Such programmes could include an accreditation process, to give more visibility and credibility to the organisations adopting Matrix seriously, organising more Matrix events, to promote the standard and share experiences amongst the community etc. Their mission will overall be to make the ecosystem thrive and grow.

A Managing Director working full time will also allow us to increase the Foundation's transparency by allowing it to report more often on such programmes, independently from any vendor.

🔗Going where we're expected to

The Governing Board is the new compass of the Foundation: it refines the vision of the Foundation and steers the Managing Director and Spec Core Team in the right direction.

This gives the Governing Board a lot of power over the Foundation and Matrix, so we've put in place several safeguards to ensure the Foundation remains healthy.

For example, the Guardians remain the ultimate authority, should the Governing Board take decisions against the interest of Matrix, and the Governing Board cannot appoint or remove members of the Spec Core Team.

To ensure that the Governing Board is representative from every stakeholder in the ecosystem, we've included both representatives from every membership levels, including individuals, but also representatives of those who are rooted in its day to day operations (i.e. the MD and the Spec Core Team), and of the Guardians.

Since the Governing Board sets the direction for the Foundation, continuity is important. Therefore, members of the Governing Board are serving for two years, with yearly elections renewing only half of the board at once. This makes room for fresh ideas without losing context of the previous decisions.

Finally, this membership scheme is also meant to formalise and better distribute the relations of power in the Matrix ecosystem, to make it more independent of specific vendors. We believe this is a major next step to make Matrix thrive, and welcome everyone to join us in our mission. You can also check our Prospective Members presentation here for more details.

In short, become a member today!

Send an email to [email protected] or browse matrix.itmanbu.com/membership

Digital Markets Act and interoperability: Debunking the gatekeepers' myths

2022-02-03 — GeneralAmandine Le Pape

Today the European Parliament, the European Council and the European Commission will meet again for a discussion about the Digital Markets Act (DMA). This is the second of three of these meetings, appropriately called trilogues, where each party exposes their stance on a proposed law and the group tries to agree on the final version.

The DMA is a groundbreaking step forward in shaking the hold a few gatekeepers have on users and the market, in particular because it looks to (among others):

  • Require gatekeepers to allow other services to interoperate with their services
  • Prevent them to treat their own services and products more favourably (for example by ranking)
  • Require them to allow users to uninstall any pre-installed software or app

The interoperability obligation is obviously the one on which we’ve kept a particularly close eye, as if it lands well it could take the success of Matrix to the next level completely overnight.

However, whilst in our mind interoperability automatically implies “open standard”, there are actually different ways of implementing it, depending on how far one wants to go. Typical debates here have been between whether to force gatekeepers to maintain open and well documented APIs, or whether to go full swing and mandate an open standard, and every shade in between.

We’ve been lucky to have had the opportunity to talk to policy advisors from different European member states, and it has been pretty fascinating to realise that it was always the same arguments which were being presented back at us, straight from the gatekeepers partyline.

We’ve ended up just listing them in a quick, high level, Myth Debunking exercise and thought it would be useful to actually publish them for everyone to access, so here they are!

  • MYTH #1 - "It is impossible to have a standard that is open, decentralized and secure at the same time"
    false: HTTPS did it, Matrix did it.
  • MYTH #2 - "It is difficult and expensive to make existing services compatible with a standard"
    false: Gitter was integrated into Matrix in less than a month, with a single developer
  • MYTH #3 - "Interoperability is incompatible with end-to-end encryption"
    false: services just have to speak the same language, email has proved this with S/MIME and PGP - where different vendors can and do interoperate with E2EE. It’s even better when the protocol is E2EE by default.
  • MYTH #4 - "It may work for messaging, but less so for social networks"
    false: it's still about managing content and users. Even though social networks have more varied content, it is already well modelled for their own APIs, ready to be expressed in a common language. The key is in the fallback option on unsupported features, as well as the ability to have moderation tools (more on that later).
  • MYTH #5 - “Interoperability is not compatible with data privacy”
    false: Interoperability gives the ability to users to choose who is hosting their data and as such choose providers they trust. Besides, the DMA doesn’t live in a vacuum: it will exist alongside horizontal regulations like the GDPR and the Data Act, which give people sufficient control over their data to rectify their choices if they are not happy. Because the possibility of interoperability is there, it does not mean it will become mandatory for users to use it: they will still have their own threat models and will make decisions accordingly, just as they do today. But enshrining interoperability in law will at least ensure gatekeepers need to provide recourse for people to have further control over their data, which will be an improvement from the landscape today.
  • MYTH #6 - "There is no user need"
    false: most haven't had a taste of interoperable chat/social media (but they know email), others are demanding bridges between services: 25% users of 2 communication apps lose contact with friends because they are using too many apps. And this figure doubles for people using more than 5 apps. There was no demand for cars when they were created: people only wanted faster horses.
  • MYTH #7 - "There is no demand from European companies"
    false: The fact it is so hard for European companies to remain competitive enough to stay alive means there are few of them to complain about what is killing them! However these companies are gathering to push for interoperability (like the Coalition for Competitive Digital Markets). It will enable them to be more innovative in the product they develop by benefiting from an existing open network rather than being slowed down by having to build one from scratch. Companies will compete on the value they add rather than the size of their network. An open standard also gives an open field for innovation from a business model perspective. The Web is an excellent example of how much an open network fuels innovation and growth.
  • MYTH #8 - "It is better to require providers to have open and stable APIs than define a single open standard"
    false: this is the best way to leave gatekeepers at the center of the ecosystem as it means that each player has to multiply its effort to interface with every single other player, but every player will only have the resources to interface with a few of its counterparts and will logically default to the bigger ones, effectively not solving the problem. In addition, if providers are not aligned on which encryption to use it will just break end-to-end encryption and create risk for the user in every bridge. In practice the DMA is about forcing the gatekeepers to interoperate only, but we strongly believe that everyone should be interoperating if we are about improving the user’s experience and control, and giving more space to companies to innovate. Limiting it to the gatekeepers is a first step, but only a defensive one.
  • MYTH #9 - “An open standard limits innovation if it defines a lowest common denominator”
    false: the lowest common denominator should match what users consider as table stakes in a messaging or social media app. Providers can innovate on top by providing different features which go beyond table stakes, for example by targeting niche use cases, like messaging services focused on elderly and disabled users, or focused on healthcare, warehouse workers, or integrated in a CRM for call centers, or creatives… Providers also can implement a profile of the standard which is a subset of its full scope, ensuring the standard remains a highest common denominator..
  • MYTH #10 - “It will be impossible to moderate social networks built on an open standard”
    false: decentralised networks actually have driven the adoption of much more sophisticated moderation techniques than the coarse approaches of centralised silos. Appropriate moderation means have to be part of the open standard definition, and some are already used in Matrix. It would also empower victims who today have no choice but get in touch with providers one by one. Each provider will also have control over their own users, and users can select providers whose T&Cs are aligned with their ethics. The world is not black and white, unlike what Silicon Valley tries to make us believe.
  • MYTH #11 - “It will take years before being able to define an open standard”
    you don’t have to: You could leverage existing technologies which are being used by the industry. Matrix, XMPP and ActivityPub exist today. For instance, Matrix has been managed by its own standard body (The Matrix Foundation) and could be ratified by a more established one like IETF, ETSI or W3C if needed.

Obviously the devil will be in the details of the way the final text is formulated, as well as the limits, obligations and controls put in place, but overall it should be an improvement for all European users and companies and we’re looking forward to seeing how today’s trilogue goes!

Goto::Hack: Ver, Berlin, Jan 2-9: A week-long session on internet decentralization!

2017-12-08 — GeneralAmandine Le Pape

We'd like to share a guest post from Dmitriy Volkov (who's been using Matrix almost since day 1!) - announcing the Goto::Hack event at the Tor Onionspace in Berlin in January.  The Onionspace will be on fire as folks attack the New Year by tackling the critical problem of internet decentralisation. A week long brainstorm and hack feels like the right way to go after the Christmas break! GNUnet, Tor, Matrix, pick your topic, or mix them all, and join the gang!  Hopefully we'll have someone there from the Matrix core team too (although it depends on funding and timings).

-- Amandine

We'd like to invite you to discuss and hack all things decentralized internet: from conceptual issues like identity and foundational tech like network stack to most practical questions, e.g. "What do I advise people at Cryptoparty in lieu of WhatsApp?" or "How do I make a GNUnet app?".

Broadly, we'll do networks, distributed systems, infosec and telecom - with GNUnet / secushare and Matrix developers, find out more here.

Time : 02-09 Jan 2018 Space : Onionspace, Gottschedstraße 4, Aufgang 4, 13357 Berlin

It's well known Big Brother has been listening to our phone calls, reading texts and partnering with companies like Amazon or Google for a while now; more and more countries start censoring Internet - it's not just China. Most "secure" communications solutions like Threema or Telegram suffer conceptual issues, like being unsecure-by-default or controlled by single commercial entity. Decentralized systems - the proposed technical part of the solution - bring forth their own challenges: how do we conveniently identify an entity (considering revocation and squatting), and why do blockchains as innovative as Bitcoin and Ethereum churn through gigawatts of energy while handling miserable tens of transactions per second? What can serve as practical, scalable infrastructure for a decentralized network alternative to current Internet: on physical and channel levels, in terms of routing, etc.? How do we forge convenient XMPP, free Signal, a WhatsApp that can be both used universally and trusted?

How do we make the Internet less centralized and what can be done to make existing distributed technologies more popular? Why is Tor not enough and how long are we going to continue communicating in plaintext? How do we cook identity, and can we better consensus?

During the event we will discuss, hack, code, debug and develop - both systems (GNUnet, Tor, Matrix, etc.) and applications based on them, fix UX and write docs. The goal is to make a measurable contribution to solving some of the described problems through the course of the week, meet in person with the people tackling the issues you care about and return home with the desire to continue hacking.

Please register at our website if you'd like to come - also, if you're not local, we are doing a group booking at a hostel and will be having some Berlin hacker community tours! (Use this if the first link didn't work for you - that's an IPNS issue and one thing in scope for the event.)

-- Dmitriy

Matrix on the Road #2 - A winning tour!

2014-11-29 — GeneralAmandine Le Pape

Some updates on the conferences Matrix attended over the last 3 weeks: WebRTC Summit in Santa Clara, TAD Summit in Istanbul, WebRTC World West in San José and fOSSa in Rennes. Great shows, ending in lots of interesting discussions and new excitement in Matrix!

🔗WebRTC Summit (Santa Clara, November 4-6)

Matrix was a sponsor at the Santa Clara WebRTC Summit at CloudExpo, and opened the WebRTC track alongside our friends at Open Peer / Hookflash. Matthew presented Matrix as the missing signalling layer for WebRTC and as a good federated complement to MQTT and COAP for IoT use cases: you can find his presentation here.

Great techie discussions and debates down there, the stand was flooded with interested people and John had a hardtime answering everyone by himself on day 2!

But he still found a few minutes to do a TV interview for SYSCon TV on Tuesday evening! :)

[embed]http://youtu.be/JVq6S9V1Jcg[/embed]

🔗TAD Summit (Istanbul, November 12-13)

Matrix was a partner at TAD Summit in Istanbul this year, a great opportunity to meet a very good mix of developers, industry players and mobile networks! TAD mixes conferences and technical workshops where everyone gets involved to create a vibrant ecosystem for Telecom Application Developers. Again really productive discussions and meetings as we continue our search for partners to help support the uptake of Matrix.

Matthew's talk was fully recorded so just watch the video to get the real pitch!

[embed]http://youtu.be/ER3g4-4bFYk?list=PLO-gJ4-4x_IIYVTuLmVr8iUedvVdduYY4[/embed]

[embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=As-5vVdXhu0[/embed]

🔗WebRTC World (San Jose, November 18-20)

Matrix's attendance at WebRTC World in San Jose was more rewarding than expected! The team was ready to be part of the expo and give a talk on FOSS WebRTC options... but didn't hesitate to jump at the opportunity when a demo slot opened up! And that was a worthwhile decision as Matrix ended up winning not one but TWO awards from the demo: The Audience Choice Award as the audience's favourite demo of the 10 shown on Tuesday, and also the overall Best Social Integration Award from the Jury! So a big congrats to the dev team who were rushing to get the fine details ready in time and to Matthew for getting the audience's attention! And of course a even bigger thank you to everyone who voted for us, including in the Jury!

Matthew at WebRTC World 2014

Of course this drew lots of interest, and WebRTC Expo ended up the busiest show ever for the team who pitched solidly at the booth for 2 days in a row!

Audience_Choice_14 Best_Social_Integration_14

🔗fOSSa (Rennes, November 20)

And eventually, while Matthew and John were celebrating in San José (or flying home, more accurately), Amandine was also evangelising at home in Rennes (France), where fOSSa was gathering experts from the opensource world for 3 days. Matrix was presented within the Serendipity section on the conférence, "Le Carrefour des Possibles": 6 minutes to pitch an open project that making dreams possible.

So if you speak French or are not afraid to only read from the slides, check out the video the team made of the pitch. The official one should be available soon!

[embed]http://youtu.be/DyL9Ue0KlBU[/embed]